Jesus Hates Bald Pussy (3598 hits)
Category: PoliticsRating: 0.11 on 70 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by JWLMAR10 (View user info) at 2004-09-15 21:55:40 EDT
Jesus Hated Bald Pussy
Let's face it- the yo-yo president of the U.S.A. knows nothing. He is a dunce. He does what he is told to do- says what he is told to say- poses the way he is told to pose. He is a Fool.
This is never an easy thing for the voters of this country to accept.
No. Nonsense. The president cannot be a Fool. Not at this moment in time- when the last living vestiges of the American Dream are on the line. This is not the time to have a bogus rich kid in charge of the White House.
Which is, after all, our house. That is our headquarters- it is where the heart of America lives. So if the president lies and acts giddy about other people's lives- if he wantonly and stupidly endorses mass murder as a logical plan to make sure we are still Number One- he is a Jackass by definition- a loud and meaningless animal with no functional intelligence and no balls.
To say that this goofy child president is looking more and more like Richard Nixon in the summer of 1974 would be a flagrant insult to Nixon.
Whoops! Did I say that? Is it even vaguely possible that some New Age Republican whore-beast of a false president could actually make Richard Nixon look like a Liberal?
The capacity of these vicious assholes we elected to be in charge of our lives for four years to commit terminal damage to our lives and our souls and our loved ones is far beyond Nixon's. Shit! Nixon was the creator of many of the once-proud historical landmarks that these dumb bastards are savagely destroying now: the Clean Air Act of 1970; Campaign Finance Reform; the endangered species act; opening a Real Politik dialogue with China; and on and on.
The prevailing quality of life in America- by any accepted methods of measuring- was inarguably freer and more politically open under Nixon than it is in this evil year of Our Lord 2002.
The Boss was a certified monster who deserved to be impeached and banished. He was a truthless creature of former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover- a foul human monument to corruption and depravity on a scale that dwarfs any other public official in American history. But Nixon was at least smart enough to understand why so many honorable patriotic U.S. citizens despised him. He was a Liar. The truth was not in him.
Nixon believed- as he said many times- that if the president of the United States does it, it can't be illegal. But Nixon never understood the much higher and meaner truth of Bob Dylan's warning that "To live outside the law you must be honest."
The difference between an outlaw and a war criminal is the difference between a pedophile and a Pederast: The pedophile is a person who thinks about sexual behavior with children, and the Pederast does these things. He lays hands on innocent children- he penetrates them and changes their lives forever.
Being the object of a pedophile's warped affections is a Routine feature of growing up in America- and being a victim of a Pederast's crazed "love" is part of dying. Innocence is no longer an option. Once penetrated, the child becomes a Queer in his own mind, and that is not much different than murder.
Richard Nixon crossed that line when he began murdering foreigners in the name of "family values"- and George Bush crossed it when he sneaked into office and began killing brown-skinned children in the name of Jesus and the American people.
When Muhammad Ali declined to be drafted and forced to kill "gooks" in Vietnam he said, "I ain't got nothin' against them Viet Cong. No Cong ever called me Nigger."
I agreed with him, according to my own personal ethics and values. He was Right.
If we all had a dash of Muhammad Ali's eloquent courage, this country and the world would be a better place today because of it.
Okay. That's it for now. Read it and weep.... See you tomorrow, folks. You haven't heard the last of me. I am the one who speaks for the spirit of freedom and decency in you. Shit. Somebody has to do it.
We have become a Nazi monster in the eyes of the whole world- a nation of bullies and bastards who would rather kill than live peacefully. We are not just Whores for power and oil, but killer whores with hate and fear in our hearts. We are human scum, and that is how history will judge us.... No redeeming social value. Just whores. Get out of our way, or we'll kill you.
Well, shit on that dumbness. George W. Bush does not speak for me or my son or my mother or my friends or the people I respect in this world. We didn't vote for these cheap, greedy little killers who speak for America today- and we will not vote for them again in 2002. Or 2004. Or ever.
Who does vote for these dishonest shitheads? Who among us can be happy and proud of having all this innocent blood on our hands? Who are these swine? These flag-sucking half-wits who get fleeced and fooled by stupid little rich kids like George Bush?
They are the same ones who wanted Muhammad Ali locked up for refusing to kill gooks. They speak for all that is cruel and stupid and vicious in the American character. They are the racists and hate mongers among us- they are the Ku Klux Klan. I piss down the throats of these Nazis.
And I am too old to worry about whether they like it or not. Fuck them.
HST, 2002
User Reviews
Submitted by Random Joe at 2004-11-03 12:59:34 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
can I marry you?
Submitted by gibberish (user info) at 2004-09-16 19:42:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Huh?
Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2004-09-16 19:36:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Have I ever run from an argument, darlin'? As I have said before while arguing with your partner in crime, Glam Daddy, a lack of response from me denotes neither cowardice nor caving in, but rather a preponderance of other things to do.
As for this particular topic, there comes a time when argument becomes futile and you're left with 'East is East and West is West and never the twain shall meet' as Kipling says. I think that he's a burned-out leftover hippy and you(for whatever reason)think he's a genius and neither of us is likely to change our opinion.
That's ok though, in the year and change we've been butting heads, the only thing we've managed to agree on is that we'd both like to see Alan Keyes be part of a presidential ticket.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 19:34:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
He's welcome back. I really want to hear what other people have to say.
Submitted by loki (user info) at 2004-09-16 17:20:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I think Quartermain has turned tail and run away.
Submitted by BLITZKREIG_BOB (user info) at 2004-09-16 15:21:51 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 13:31:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Amen Loki.
Submitted by loki (user info) at 2004-09-16 12:57:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Fear and Loathing is already a classic. My prediction is that Rum Diaries will be as well. If you don't like his stuff, great that's your deal, but if you think that his writing is really nothing more than a look at how fucked up I am then you have a reading comprehension issue or you're so hung up on the drug thing that you can't look past it long enough to get to the theme he's talking about.
**Strange memories on this nervous night in Las Vegas. Five years later? Six? It seems like a lifetime, or at least a main era - -the kind of peak that never comes again. San Francisco in the middle sixties was a very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run, but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world.
Whatever it meant. There was madness in any direction, at any hour. If not across the Bay, then up the Golden Gate or down 101 to Los Altos or La Honda. You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning.
And that, I think, was the handle - -that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn't need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting - -on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark - -the place where the wave finally broke and rolled back. **
The ravings on a drugged out lunatic indeed.
Submitted by loki (user info) at 2004-09-16 12:44:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Freak Power
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 10:26:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Stevie, do you have a clip of the Conan O'Brien segment?
Submitted by fluff (user info) at 2004-09-16 10:22:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by runninginplace (user info) at 2004-09-16 09:35:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by stevie_says (user info) at 2004-09-16 03:31:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I hate Hunter. What a douche. My idiot friends worship him. I have had to sit through 'Fear and Loathing' too many times to count.
The only thing I ever enjoyed that he did was when he and Conan O'Brien went to a shooting range drunk. Even then, I kept hoping that Conan would end up shooting him in the head.
Rotten old bastard.
Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2004-09-16 03:19:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
**Even in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, the most drug-filled book he has written, the main theme is the role of the American Dream in the modern world.**
See, thats the kind of shit that people who write for 'literary' reviews and the 'alternative press' come up. They babble a bunch stuff about how him getting tanked off his ass on mescaline or peyote is symbolic of a spiritual journey or the fact that he cruises around looking for more drugs in a Chevrolet is really a metaphor for looking for the American Dream because they don't want to admit that they just spent the last 2 1/2 hours reading/or writing a review for a book that could just as easily have been entitled 'I'm All Fucked-Up On Big Red Pills.'
It's like those fucking David Lynch films. I got drug(dragged?)to go see 'Mullholland Dr.' and that was quite possibly the worst movie I have ever seen. I'm sitting there and I got the feeling that that film had been edited by the simple expedient of handing the film reel and a pair of scissors to a thalidomide baby with ADD. I sat there for 2 1/2 hours and the only time I had a clue what was going on was when the two chicks were having sex with each other. So I read the review next day and the reviewer uses lots of words like 'zeitgeist' and 'weltanschaungg' and basically, once you wring all the pretentiousness and German out it, you can see she didn't know what the hell the damn thing waas about either, but there was no way she was going to admit it.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 03:09:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
You certainly have the right to your own opinion and I'm not attacking that. I'm simply stating that you have made a number of inacurate statements. You were wrong about the main themes of his work. Sure, drug use is a common theme in a lot of his work. That doesn't mean that it is the main theme in each work. In fact, I haven't read one of his works where the main theme was simply about getting messed up.
I'm sure most people would also agree that FLLV will become a classic someday, but I can't predict the future, so I can't really say you're wrong on that.
I'm just saying that you are entitled to your opinion, but if you're opinion is based on inaccuracies then I will point that out and I won't necessarily be nice about it.
Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2004-09-16 03:03:37 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
And that's another thing. This attitude of 'you have a negative opinion of something I like so you must not know what you're talking about because if you did you would come to the same conclusion I did' is complete bollocks. This may come as a complete surprise to you, but it is quite possible for two people to be exposed to the same thing and have two completely different but equally valid reactions.
I am familiar with the works of Hunter S. Thompson and the opinion I have formed is that he's a pathetic 'counterculture' leftover who, if he mumbled his 'essays' on a street corner instead of writing them down would be the sort of person that people would avoid making eye contact with and make a circle around to avoid.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 02:59:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"Yeah, there was a time when I was in the market for stories that all revolved around the themes of 'We got drunk/stoned/wasted/hallucinated and fucked shit up' and 'Look at me, I know famous people so that means I'm better/smarter/more talented than you', but then I graduated high school."
If you think getting fucked up was the theme of most of his work, you seriously need to go back to school. Even in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, the most drug-filled book he has written, the main theme is the role of the American Dream in the modern world. It's pretty obvious that this is the main theme. You would have to be a complete idiot to think that he is simply writing about getting fucked up.
Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2004-09-16 02:54:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
**If you actually decided to read some of his work, you would find that he is possibly the most insightful societal commentator of the 20th century.**
I read this and just about laughed myself into an episode. First of all, it's such an idiotically pretentious thing to say. Secondly, my antipathy towards the man and his body, well we'll be charitable and call it 'work' stems from my familiarity with him and his noxious screeds.
Yeah, there was a time when I was in the market for stories that all revolved around the themes of 'We got drunk/stoned/wasted/hallucinated and fucked shit up' and 'Look at me, I know famous people so that means I'm better/smarter/more talented than you', but then I graduated high school.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 02:35:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
If you actually decided to read some of his work, you would find that he is possibly the most insightful societal commentator of the 20th century.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 02:32:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2004-09-16 02:19:18 (#)
Ranking: 0
**In the future many of his works will be considered classics.**
Must be some kind of nightmarish, dystopian future where the population of earth has smoked themselves retarded then.
Or possibly a planet where apes evolved from men. "
This is such a weak way of thinking. Suppose Einstein did drugs. Would you then discredit all of his work?
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 02:28:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas will become a classic for sure. I'm not sure about anything else. Hell, FLLV is already considered a classic by many.
Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2004-09-16 02:19:18 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
**In the future many of his works will be considered classics.**
Must be some kind of nightmarish, dystopian future where the population of earth has smoked themselves retarded then.
Or possibly a planet where apes evolved from men.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 02:01:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
You should read more by Hunter S. Thompson. In the future many of his works will be considered classics.
Submitted by Quasiplasmohedron (user info) at 2004-09-16 01:21:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:55:37 (#)
Ranking: 0
"Oh, and plus 1 only cause this is basically just cut and paste. The context was good though."
I wish I had found this somewhere on the internet so I could cut and paste. I retyped this from a book.
Thank you. From the bottom of my heart, thank you.
Submitted by Quasiplasmohedron (user info) at 2004-09-16 01:19:33 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I'm giving this a +2 even though you didn't write it and even though it jumped around quite a lot. It expressed the feeling better than anything else I've read.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 00:43:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
huh?
Submitted by MoonStone (user info) at 2004-09-16 00:37:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
its true, but who can we blame but ourselfs? we were the ones who said him to run for the head of the republicans. we are the ones who voted him into office. you blaim the goverment or at least the president, but how can you complain when you havent done shit to change how the goverment works?
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-16 00:29:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Leave this one to the adults, Tom.
Submitted by Tom (user info) at 2004-09-16 00:15:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Where is all your talent?
Submitted by Nobb (user info) at 2004-09-16 00:07:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:59:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Actually there are many points that legalizing illegal substances would be a very wise thing to do. So the republicans are heavily against it...right? This is true. But do you see the democrats changing this? HELL NO.
This is why I cannot vote for a Democrat.
I am a Libertarian, no doubt. And they are the TRUE liberals.
Submitted by DonkeyOnTheEdge (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:58:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:44:50 (#)
Ranking: 0
Yes I can vote. I'm assuming you can too, but do the world a favor and stay home
---------------------------
Sorry, can't let Kerry think hes going to win. I'll vote early, and often. Just like the Dems in the last election.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:58:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Okay, I just found it in about 3 different places through google. Now I feel like a dumbass.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:55:37 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"Oh, and plus 1 only cause this is basically just cut and paste. The context was good though."
I wish I had found this somewhere on the internet so I could cut and paste. I retyped this from a book.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:53:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I've heard many people claim that a vote for Kerry would result in more terrorist attacks, or that a vote for Kerry is equal to a vote for terrorism. So yes, you could write an article claiming that anyone who votes for Kerry is a douche. This would obviously be a ridiculous lie, but the sad thing is that a lot of people would believe you.
The difference here is that Bush has proven himself to be a terrible leader and an even worse manager of this country.
Submitted by someone (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:50:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Submitted by polyamorousaj (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:33:32 (#)
Ranking: -2
Who the fuck is Hunter S. Thompson and why would anyone care?
-------
Im going to pretend I didnt read this. Hunter S. Thompson is not only a literature GENIUS but also a shining example about how drugs aren't neccessarily the cause to societies problems, rather the people that take these drugs are. Basically, drugs aren't for everyone. Read Thompson and argue otherwise, or better yet, Jack Kerouac and the beat generation.
Fuck straight edge.
Oh, and plus 1 only cause this is basically just cut and paste. The context was good though.
Submitted by screamfeeder (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:45:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
"""Can I write an article calling "anyone who would vote for Kerry is a fucking douche, a worthless piece of shit that is useless in life and damaging to the entire world"? Yes. Would it be true? No. """
no but the Neo-Cons do it anyway. ;)
Submitted by Pringles4eva (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:45:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
#2: He talks about Nixon killing foreigners because of "family values" but wasn't it Kennedy and Johnson ultimately responsible for Vietnam? The only reason Nixon didn't pull our troops out earlier is because he thought it would be politically damaging. Now THIS is an issue worth talking about, not rhetoric from the author. He says alot of stuff, that's for sure.
Eisenhower started sending in advisors. The Viet Cong are responsible for Vietnam since they blew the shit out of the French.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:44:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Yes I can vote. I'm assuming you can too, but do the world a favor and stay home.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:42:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Do you want me to bash the writer's article? I can do that if you want.
#1: He generalizes the american public. Can he do this while putting himself on a higher pedestal? That's arrogance. I am not one of these generalized people, so his article tries to convince if you understand what he is trying to say you are on a higher level and everyone else who would disagree with him is generalized as morons. This is a form of propaganda.
#2: He talks about Nixon killing foreigners because of "family values" but wasn't it Kennedy and Johnson ultimately responsible for Vietnam? The only reason Nixon didn't pull our troops out earlier is because he thought it would be politically damaging. Now THIS is an issue worth talking about, not rhetoric from the author. He says alot of stuff, that's for sure.
#3: He basically equated anyone with voting for George W. Bush to be scum and moronic. And the points he offers is "the world hates us" and "Bush lies" and "suckers who wave the flag are shit".
Do people want to know why this nation is divided? It's this type of writing and the people who want to further themselves from people who agree with it. But, it's always blamed on the republicans isn't it?
Can I write an article calling "anyone who would vote for Kerry is a fucking douche, a worthless piece of shit that is useless in life and damaging to the entire world"? Yes. Would it be true? No.
This is pure rhetoric, and the only people who fall for that are the uneducated and ones who already have his beliefs. You don't think he knows that?
Submitted by DonkeyOnTheEdge (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:37:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Touche. I am in fact, a jackass. One question. Can you even vote?
Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:35:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
**Who the fuck is Hunter S. Thompson and why would anyone care?**
He's a guy who did truly massive amounts of drugs back in the sixties and seventies and hung out with all the right 'counterculture' types and has lived off that 'reputation' for the last thirty years while he pretends to be a writer. He writes things like 'Things I Found In My Belly-Button After A Three-Day Bender' and people read it in Rolling Stone(another waste of paper now that P.J. O'Rourke is gone) and go 'ooohhh' and 'aaaahhh' and 'how deeeeep' and shit like that.
Submitted by polyamorousaj (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:34:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:29:11 (#)
Ranking: 0
I guess that's where your name comes from.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:28:57 (#)
Ranking: 0
That was so very insightful Donkey.The only point you have proven is that you're a total jackass.
***
Wow, this totally made up for the post. Hilarious. +2.
Submitted by polyamorousaj (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:33:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
"Jesus Hates Bald Pussy"- I'll tell your mom to stop shaving right away.
Who the fuck is Hunter S. Thompson and why would anyone care?
Why can't you write your own opinions down?
People are turning into fucking drones.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:29:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I guess that's where your name comes from.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:28:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
That was so very insightful Donkey.The only point you have proven is that you're a total jackass.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:27:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
What is wrong with choosing the lesser of two evils? Sure, it isn't a perfect situation, but the stakes are too high to pick the greater of the two evils.
Submitted by DonkeyOnTheEdge (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:26:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
Dylan is over rated. If you'd like to quote a band thats liberal, quote the Dead Kennedys.
Too drunk to fuck, indeed.
Also, this was rehashed dog shit as far as I'm concerned. When Kerry loses, which he will, cause hes a bigger moron than you'd like to believe, I am going to set up shop and collect everyone's social security card and birth certificate who said they are going to move out of the country if Bush wins.
November 3rd, 12:01 AM until you all fucking leave.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:24:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
jwlmar10, no actually I am all in favor of bashing Bush. Just when it is done right and not simply as "Bush sucks" or "anybody but Bush".
But these same people blindly defend Kerry and many know the slightest thing about him. And quite often, once they do know about him they don't like him...but they still say "better than Bush" or "lesser of two evils". But at least they acknowledge this and that I can give them respect for.
I'm libertarian, anyways. This republican/democrat show has hurt the USA for the past 40 years and as long as they keep feeding us Bush's and Kerry's, it will never end.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:24:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
It's ridiculous that you people can feel satisfied bashing the writer rather than what is written.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:17:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
So what if it is biased? Bush deserves to be bashed. Let someone from the right wing bash Kerry. You can't tell someone that it isn't ok to bash one side. All you can do is try to dispute the arguments. Telling someone that it is biased to tell an opinion makes you look like a fool. Of course it is biased. That's the definition of an opinion.
Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:14:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I wouldn't put too much stock in the babblings of a man who built an entire literary career on the fact that he turned his brain into little blackened turds with a wide variety of illegal chemicals.
Heres another quote for you from the same guy: 'The Irish will always be with us...evil and besotted.'
Yeah, what a prince.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:13:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Hidden, why don't you start up an "Ex-Drunks who support Kerry" political action group?
I know you have a soft spot in your heart for alcoholics, being one yourself. You can get together with your buddies and talk about the old times of passing out while covered in vomit. Then you can create new conspiracy theories to pass around the US in chain-emails. "DO NOT BREAK THE CHAIN!"
jwlmar10, I can understand your view. The man obviously is intelligent and has used this to his advantage, albeit in a radical kind of way. Maybe just the cut you posted made me want to respond merely to address the fact that bashing one side (republicans and democrats) without bashing the other is severely biased.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:08:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"No, I find it great that people like you love to hear the political ramblings of a known drug addict and drunk."
What do drugs and alcohol have to do with his opinions? Somebody who prefers cake to pie will continue to like cake despite the use of drugs and alcohol. Why would his political views be affected at all?
Submitted by hidden101 (user info) at 2004-09-15 23:07:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
stabkill, do you have any idea how stupid you are making yourself sound?
face it, you got nothin'. NOTHING. now get over it and move on.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:59:33 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No, I find it great that people like you love to hear the political ramblings of a known drug addict and drunk. Maybe because you and him are very much alike?
Quoting Dylan (another drug user) is even better. I'm going to write my congressmen and hope the next time they address congress they break out some lyrics from Bad Religion to address foreign policy.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:58:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:40:57 (#)
Ranking: -2
Here is another point to consider: This guy is a notorious drug and alcohol abuser. He gets nailed for drunk driving and it's some "great conspiracy"??? Give me a break."
Here is another point to consider: Being an alcohol and drug abuser does not affect political thinking beyond maybe wanting legalization. Just because he enjoys getting high and boozing it up does not mean that his writing is invalid. Sigmund Freud was a frequent cocaine user. Should we throw out all of his theories because of that?
And of course there was a conspiracy against Hunter. He lived in Aspen (A conservative city) and everyone knew that he was a drug user and all around hell-raiser at times. The cops would have loved to nab him on something. Shit, when he was running for sherriff of Aspen, his opponent hired a tough-looking actor to come to his house and threaten him. The authority figures in Aspen felt threatened by such a radical person and of course they were looking for a reason to throw him in a prison.
I also don't care about GW's DUI. I'm sure that wasn't a high point in his life, but I don't think it has affected his job as a president. There are many more relevant reasons to be upset with Bush. The DUI issue is more of a nonissue in my opinion.
Submitted by hidden101 (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:51:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
domenad and stabkill are just angry because the arguments against their side are better than the arguments FOR their side.
Submitted by hidden101 (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:48:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
what the hell does this have to do with a DUI???
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:48:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
The only redeeming thing about this stupid post is that you didn't write it.
Submitted by hidden101 (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:47:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:29:12 (#)
Ranking: -2
Legally insane blatherings from a disgruntled moron.
==============================================================
yeah, Hunter Thompson is a moron... so what are you, some kind of devine genius?
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:40:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Here is another point to consider: This guy is a notorious drug and alcohol abuser. He gets nailed for drunk driving and it's some "great conspiracy"??? Give me a break.
Those same people who say this are the same ones ridiculing Bush for getting a DUI.
This is where people with intelligence might say "Well, they both got a DUI. So what?"
But, this is where the left-wing fruits and conspiracy-loving lunatics will say "No, the Bush one was real but Thompson's actually WAS a setup."
Ok, pal...just keep talking. You are all the same.
Submitted by Degreeless_Capibara at 2004-09-15 22:36:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Great read.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:29:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Legally insane blatherings from a disgruntled moron.
Of course if you are a left-wing fruitcake this shit is right up your alley.
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:27:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by sketch9 (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:12:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
i love thompson. one of the best writers in american history.
Submitted by hidden101 (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:12:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
good read. i like it a lot.
Submitted by spedmonkey (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:07:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
... wait, go back to the part where Jesus likes shaved bajiners?
Submitted by GodLovesALittleLovin (user info) at 2004-09-15 22:01:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Jesus also dislikes asparagus and canned meats such as vienna sausages.
Submitted by jwlmar10 (user info) at 2004-09-15 21:58:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
This is taken from Hunter S. Thompson's latest book, Kingdom of Fear. Give me a minus two if you want for posting something written by someone else, but I wanted more people to read this.