Arrested for asking a question (1931 hits)
Category: NoneRating: -0.39 on 79 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by <> (View user info) at 2007-06-07 03:51:09 EDT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOerYpJse30
What more can I say?
User Reviews
Submitted by TheSpook (user info) at 2007-06-10 22:17:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
They should arrest more wackos like that.
Submitted by williamson (user info) at 2007-06-09 02:10:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Somehow I knew this would be Infowars stuff...
At any rate, I`m all for asking these fuckers questions... To be arrested is absurd, but (depending on who owns/rents the property), the fella getting interviewed may have the right to disallow anyone on premises that they don`t want... Therefore an escort out of the building is in order, not an arrest.
If it were a public building, its a different matter however....
+2 for researching Infowars
-2 for deciding THIS is the information worth showing everyone when there are much more important things than this going on.
Submitted by pandora (user info) at 2007-06-08 23:36:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Judging by what I saw on the video alone, I don't think that guy should've been arrested. After all, he wasn't blocking the Giuliani spokesman's path, so he wasn't "forcing" him to respond. The spokesman willingly turned back to respond to him several times. I think, in a situation like that, if you start shouting or refuse to leave, you can expect to be escorted outside. To be arrested, however, seems excessive.
Submitted by MaesterMeat (user info) at 2007-06-08 18:39:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"As a pussy fucking Canadian"- Sorry ETS, but up here in Canada we do prefer to fuck pussy, what do you fuck? your palm? your cousin? your banjo?
------
You just got smoked the fuck up!
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2007-06-08 11:47:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Say less
Submitted by inion_de_trua (user info) at 2007-06-08 09:41:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-08 09:23:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
It simply allows you to print or say what you want, that is it, end of story.
------
actually you can't even do that. slander and libel are against the law.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-08 09:24:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
myoptic = myopic
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-08 09:23:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:52:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
If that "stupid kid" has a press pass at a media event, yes he has the right to ask a question, and if the respondent is being evasive, he has the first amendment right to press the issue. That's what the concept of a "free press" is all about, the pursuit of truth, and placing a check on the otherwise unchecked power of government to do their business in total secret without so much as an explanation to the people they supposedly represent!
--------------------------
Try and get this into your tiny myoptic little brain.
Freedom of press doesn't give you the right to disrupt or harrass anyone, it doesn't give you the right to break the law or ignore polics.
It simply allows you to print or say what you want, that is it, end of story.
Do you understand now?
It is amazing how much you claim to know yet still lack basic understanding of the fundamentals in everything you try and talk about.
Submitted by DasHeer (user info) at 2007-06-08 09:09:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-08 08:54:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:52:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:22:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
according to ETS, one is forced to answer questions by stupid kids who like to stir shit
--------------
If that "stupid kid" has a press pass at a media event, yes he has the right to ask a question, and if the respondent is being evasive, he has the first amendment right to press the issue. That's what the concept of a "free press" is all about, the pursuit of truth, and placing a check on the otherwise unchecked power of government to do their business in total secret without so much as an explanation to the people they supposedly represent!
As a pussy fucking Canadian, I don't expect you to understand the deep-seeded tradition we have in this country since your people were a bunch of British sympathizers and Frenchmen who, if you're any representative of, obviously don't give a flying fuck about the true nature and derivation of Freedom.
In short, fuck you, boy. Just, fuck you.
===
"As a pussy fucking Canadian"- Sorry ETS, but up here in Canada we do prefer to fuck pussy, what do you fuck? your palm? your cousin? your banjo?
"British sympathizers" last time I checked, the people who colonized the BRITISH thirteen colonies came from England, Scotland and Ireland, so what you should be saying, is rejected french people and Loyalist Patriots, not to mention only about one third of Americans in the revolutionary war supported the revolution about a third sat on the fence and the rest were loyal to their crown, instead of successionist traitors (isn't it great how in the civil war the south were called traitors and successionists but in the revolutionary war, fought over similar principles, you know less taxes, reduced tariffs etc... The traitors were called "patriots"?)
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-08 08:58:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
an example: http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=639
now stfu with your america = freedom and learn that behaving like a clown in public will get your ass in trouble, wherever you live.
it's called maturity.
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-08 08:54:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:52:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:22:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
according to ETS, one is forced to answer questions by stupid kids who like to stir shit
--------------
If that "stupid kid" has a press pass at a media event, yes he has the right to ask a question, and if the respondent is being evasive, he has the first amendment right to press the issue. That's what the concept of a "free press" is all about, the pursuit of truth, and placing a check on the otherwise unchecked power of government to do their business in total secret without so much as an explanation to the people they supposedly represent!
As a pussy fucking Canadian, I don't expect you to understand the deep-seeded tradition we have in this country since your people were a bunch of British sympathizers and Frenchmen who, if you're any representative of, obviously don't give a flying fuck about the true nature and derivation of Freedom.
In short, fuck you, boy. Just, fuck you.
===
you seem to be very obsessed with my origins.
funny, because if you look at any quality of life index, the US has one of the worse scores for freedom of press in the industrialized world while we rank among the top. that kind of invalidates your shitty argument, eh?
i'm not one to brag or measure my country's dick, but since you're obsessed with people's origins, why not?
it's also funny how you're the 1st to slam neocons for using freedom as a buzzword and do the same in your arguments when talking to foreigners.
don't take this the wrong way, but i think you're past medical treatment. you're a clinical case.
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-08 08:48:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:38:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:19:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
his blonde friend is the same guy that harassed Rockerfeller and said, right on infowars.com that he was "forced to leave" when in fact, he was just asked gently to stopped being a flippant dick. he says himself he's from wearechange.org, which is slappered all over infowars.com. so much for not related, you lying fuckhead. and no, infowars is not a reliable news source...at all. throughtout all articles, opinions can be read every two parapraphs. it's just like fox news, except you agree with it.
since when is anyone obliged to explain himself? he was getting ignored and could've stopped there but he kept asking louder and louder. he wasn't taken away right away. he was getting more and more annoying until the guy said to the police: "get him out of here [...] done being polite with this guy"
nothing to panick about here. STFU!
---------------
You fucking moron. I swear to god you should just be shot. You're not even worth arguing with when you can't even LISTEN!
Let me say this YET AGAIN SINCE YOU CAN'T SEEM TO GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR BOYFRIEND'S ASS...
BESIDES the guys from wearechange.org, there was a COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT WITNESS ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW. WHAT PART OF THIS DO YOU NOT UNDERASTAND YOU DEAF BLIND AND DUMB CANADIAN?
If you don't think Infowars is reliable, that's fine, but the video your see wasn't uploaded by wearechange.org or Infowars. They are using it for now in their links because some independent journalist was good enough to post it on their own to the web, this according to the interviews on the Alex Jones Show.
Now to this: "since when is anyone obliged to explain himself?"
Let's see if I can put this gently... SINCE HE WAS RUNNING FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED FUCKING STATES OF AMERICA, YOU COMMIE TWITFUCK!
Now, say something else, you stupid fuck. Dumbass fucking Canadian. Better yet, how about YOU STFU before you infect any more of my countrymen with your pussy doctrine of "surrender at all costs".
What's your country's motto, Caul? "Don't surrender until you see the whites of their eyes?"
It was a forum for journalists to ASK QUESTIONS. He has no place telling ANYONE to be thrown out. he has no more power than the journalists asking the questions, period! That is called DEMOCRACY, you fucking fool!
Seriously, take your stupid fucking opinions and shove them up your over-dilated asshole.
===
the true face of Brad Linzy...when in short of anything reasonable to say, scream louder.
no, Brad, no one is forced to answer anything. even if cops are handcuffing you, you are entitled to STFU. if you keep harassing someone who's politely declining to answer your retarded crap, you will asked to leave by security eventually. if you refuse to, you will get arrested.
it works the same way in bars. if you think you're entitled to talk to a girl and harasses her, you will be punted out of the building.
it's called the real world, brad.
please have another fit...it was awesome
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-08 07:50:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:49:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Now, why won't Giuliani answer a simple question? Why won't he address what they're asking, which is: "Why did he say on television shortly after 9/11 that he knew beforehand that the towers were about to come down?"
--------------
He was told the towers were probably going to fall after they had been hit. Watch the fucking video, and use your fucking head. Stop trying to imply that he knew for a fact they were going to fall, or that he knew it was going to fall before the planes hit.
He gains absolutely nothing by addressing a group that intentionally twists his words to fit their own sick fantasy about 9/11.
I would lose respect for any candidate that entertained such insane questions.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-08 07:43:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:42:18 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
You are totally misrepresenting this whole situation, and YES YOU ARE the one making assumptions, because I heard the whole story from the witnesses and participants themselves on Alex Jones' Show Wednesday.
---------------------
On Alex Jones show?
The same show that says we are being poisened by chemtrails? He has no credability, nor does anyone who appears on his show. Do you really think any of the witnesses to the event who would appear on Alex jone's show would be impartial?
I see you still fail to show any proof that CNN wanted him to stay, other than the word of another of Jone's cronies.
Submitted by Jeanneee (user info) at 2007-06-07 20:59:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:52:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:42:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Geee...no text and a link.....the effort involved is staggering.
---------------
Did you watch the link? Did you even take the fucking time out of your precious little fucking day to do that, you little CHILD? Did you?
-----------
Hahahaha, +2 for making ETS cry.
Submitted by Foolproof (user info) at 2007-06-07 20:48:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 18:54:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Hey, that's still better than every time you open your fucking mouth.
----
ETS, listen carefully.
There is a saying "One man can change the world." I think that is true.
However, when that saying came into existence, they were not talking about some fucking lunatic sitting at his computer linking to asinine drivel a thrid grader can dispute on a website that nobody in the known universe takes seriously. When you talk about action, that's all you offer. Talk.
You, simply, don't have the testicular fortitude or personal drive to actually follow through on anything you ever threaten. Period.
You are a nervous little netzien, cautiously watching the shadows for the enemy that only you think is coming, making yourself out to be a fool everytime you say anything.
To call you a joke is an insult to jokes.
In closing; until I read in the paper about you actually doing just one little fucking thing you threatened - you, sir, fail.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-06-07 19:39:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:20:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
If the questions are so preposterous (and some of them are) they should be easy to explain with a little time, research and transparency.
Yet some of them never get addressed and fuel this kind of manic idiocy to continue.
ELECTED government officials should be held specifically accountable for satisfying the curiosity of the people who brought them into power.
However trivial. However painful.
---
That is all fine and nice - but the reality is government officials don't have the time to answer trivial questions like "why are you causing God to kill soilders by allowing fags in America?", for example - it's rather absurd to suggest that is possible.
---
You're right, of course. I was being a bit generalistic in that statement.
I guess what I am saying is that in this culture of ignorance and distraction that we embrace - legitimate questions are being asked and conveniently ignored by elected representatives because ultimately 'we' don't give a shit.
That doesn't change the fact that those questions SHOULD be answered. I think most of you would agree with that, yet find more joy in marginalizing the fact someone had the AUDACITY to make that kind of observation instead of truly examining how fucking ridiculous it is that we allow those questions to be ignored.
Of course ,there are always going to be idiotic questions, like the one you just illustrated - but there are much less absurd questions that are getting lost in the bullshit drama those kind of questions create.
Most people readily admit that there are many questions about the event of 9-11 that remain unanswered. Investigations have been stalled, information has been classified and a growing number of people are curious to have them explained. The 9-11 commission was a joke. There has been very little in the way of transparency and people who are passionate to have their concerns addressed are marginalized and ridiculed.
But thats not all:
Questions about the environment and its protection go unanswered.
Questions about the iraq war go unanswered.
Questions about health care go unanswered.
Questions about taxation go unanswered.
Questions about prescription drugs go unanswered.
*idea
Perhaps an online repository of questions should be organized in a similar fashion to digg. These "unanswered" questions could be submitted by users and the ones that receive the most interest each week (or day) are then presented to a panel of experts (including ELECTED public officials) who then seek to answer them in a very transparent fashion - no matter how embarrassing or absurd they might be. If the public has 'voted' - then they need to be answered.
Have a round table discussion, visually show the research that is being done like programs such as Dateline and 20/20 do. Eventually definitive answers to some of the greatest questions out there will be available at one reliable place.
Could be cool.
Perhaps this could even be done over at ask.com? It's always been a marginal portal at best. This could be a good idea for their own business development... anyone know people over there?
Submitted by MaesterMeat (user info) at 2007-06-07 19:16:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
site- cite. Nevermind me then.
Submitted by MaesterMeat (user info) at 2007-06-07 19:11:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
That shit is awesome how the people who are supposedly way above ETS's brainwashing by Alex Jones (whom they compare to Fred Phelps) are arguing tit-for-tat with him like they can prove exactly the opposite of what they say ETS can't prove.
Good luck with that shit.
For one, you can throw the dude out, but you can't arrest the motherfucker. He was sponsored in there so unless he breaks actual laws why the fuck could they throw him out?
For two, he's stirring shit knowing they are going to get all offended and pissed off about it. He's trying to get them to do something that he can site as "prevention of freedom of speech"
He's being an annoying fuck, but arresting him? I'm sorry that's bullshit.
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-06-07 19:11:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:52:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:42:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Geee...no text and a link.....the effort involved is staggering.
---------------
Did you watch the link? Did you even take the fucking time out of your precious little fucking day to do that, you little CHILD? Did you?
----------
No
Submitted by MaesterMeat (user info) at 2007-06-07 18:56:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Fuck you boy, fuck you.
ets rocks cocks
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 18:54:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Hey, that's still better than every time you open your fucking mouth.
Submitted by Foolproof (user info) at 2007-06-07 18:41:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 18:39:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Fucking retards.
----
I think that EXACT thing everytime you link to a "reliable" source.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 18:39:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Oh wow, you mean there's more sources of information out there besides CNN and BBC!? Holy fucking shit! Whodda thunk it!?!?
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0706/S00036.htm
http://talkback.lancasteronline.com/index.php?showtopic=48427
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/06/06/american-reporters-arrest-captured-on-youtube
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=43079
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Reporter_arrested_after_Republican_debate_0606.html
http://bostonnow.com/community/blogs/blackbart213/2007/06/06/rudy-giulianis-campaign-hates-freedom/
But hey...this is America, right...no reason to question or fear any of this... http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=153637&version=1&template_id=45&parent_id=25
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/greenslade/2007/06/reporter_arrested_for_testing.html
But, hey, we've got youtube to help us expose any problems that might arise... http://www.workers.org/2007/us/youtube-0607/
Fucking retards.
Submitted by The_Drake (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:54:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I get all my news from Uber. Its better, and WAAAAY more colorful.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:52:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:42:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Geee...no text and a link.....the effort involved is staggering.
---------------
Did you watch the link? Did you even take the fucking time out of your precious little fucking day to do that, you little CHILD? Did you?
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:52:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:22:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
according to ETS, one is forced to answer questions by stupid kids who like to stir shit
--------------
If that "stupid kid" has a press pass at a media event, yes he has the right to ask a question, and if the respondent is being evasive, he has the first amendment right to press the issue. That's what the concept of a "free press" is all about, the pursuit of truth, and placing a check on the otherwise unchecked power of government to do their business in total secret without so much as an explanation to the people they supposedly represent!
As a pussy fucking Canadian, I don't expect you to understand the deep-seeded tradition we have in this country since your people were a bunch of British sympathizers and Frenchmen who, if you're any representative of, obviously don't give a flying fuck about the true nature and derivation of Freedom.
In short, fuck you, boy. Just, fuck you.
If you people want to listen to Caul and these other dumb fucks, you're welcome, but don't you EVER whine about you or your children losing freedoms ever again, because if you can look at this video without even a modicum of curiosity what the HELL is going on here, you've obviously already resigned yourself to having no freedoms. Someone once said, you only have those freedoms that you assert. You are some of the most UNassertive, spoiled little nitwits I've ever seen or heard of in my entire fucking life outside those bitches from "The Simple Life"... The generation that fought and died in World War II would be ashamed of you all.
Good luck with your cowardice. You wear it well.
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:42:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Geee...no text and a link.....the effort involved is staggering.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:38:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:19:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
his blonde friend is the same guy that harassed Rockerfeller and said, right on infowars.com that he was "forced to leave" when in fact, he was just asked gently to stopped being a flippant dick. he says himself he's from wearechange.org, which is slappered all over infowars.com. so much for not related, you lying fuckhead. and no, infowars is not a reliable news source...at all. throughtout all articles, opinions can be read every two parapraphs. it's just like fox news, except you agree with it.
since when is anyone obliged to explain himself? he was getting ignored and could've stopped there but he kept asking louder and louder. he wasn't taken away right away. he was getting more and more annoying until the guy said to the police: "get him out of here [...] done being polite with this guy"
nothing to panick about here. STFU!
---------------
You fucking moron. I swear to god you should just be shot. You're not even worth arguing with when you can't even LISTEN!
Let me say this YET AGAIN SINCE YOU CAN'T SEEM TO GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR BOYFRIEND'S ASS...
BESIDES the guys from wearechange.org, there was a COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT WITNESS ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW. WHAT PART OF THIS DO YOU NOT UNDERASTAND YOU DEAF BLIND AND DUMB CANADIAN?
If you don't think Infowars is reliable, that's fine, but the video your see wasn't uploaded by wearechange.org or Infowars. They are using it for now in their links because some independent journalist was good enough to post it on their own to the web, this according to the interviews on the Alex Jones Show.
Now to this: "since when is anyone obliged to explain himself?"
Let's see if I can put this gently... SINCE HE WAS RUNNING FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED FUCKING STATES OF AMERICA, YOU COMMIE TWITFUCK!
Now, say something else, you stupid fuck. Dumbass fucking Canadian. Better yet, how about YOU STFU before you infect any more of my countrymen with your pussy doctrine of "surrender at all costs".
What's your country's motto, Caul? "Don't surrender until you see the whites of their eyes?"
It was a forum for journalists to ASK QUESTIONS. He has no place telling ANYONE to be thrown out. he has no more power than the journalists asking the questions, period! That is called DEMOCRACY, you fucking fool!
Seriously, take your stupid fucking opinions and shove them up your over-dilated asshole.
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:22:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
according to ETS, one is forced to answer questions by stupid kids who like to stir shit
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:20:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:55:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
What the hell is the MATTER with you fucking people!?!?>!
What is wrong with you so-called Americans?
===
you're doing it again, ETS.
you're acting like a dick.
acting like a dick gets you nowhere in life.
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:19:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:49:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:19:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Razor (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:07:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
You all know that I usually disagree with ETS, but the truth is after watching that video they had no right whatsoever to arrest that man.
===
we don,t even know if he was arrested. and that blonde bitch at the end is a two-bit wigger who acts like an oppressed revolutionary. you should watch the video where he harasses a geriatric rockerfeller coming out of his house and simply gets gently told to stop by an old man. he spins it as "forced to leave for asking questions"
we don't even see his "arrested" collegue. he also says "they almost arrested me when i told them it was wrong what they were doing", when in reality, any cop will give you shit if you interfer.
we have a douche by the name of jaggi singh who does the same thing here: stir shit, refuse to comply so that you get removed, violently if possible, film, cry for police state and voilà.
------------------------------
See, this kind of rush judgment on Caul's part is just appalling to me. Am I alone in this?
Look, if you guys want or care to have the whole scoop, listen to the Wednesday Alex jones Show, or go to infowars and read the article they posted.
I cannot stress this enough for those of you who will inevitable make the same idiotic judgments about infowars being somehow "illegitimate" as a news source that there were plenty of other witnesses to what happened and at least one of them was on the Alex Jones Show. He was from a local New Hampshire newspaper with absolutely no affiliation with Infowars.com. He corroborated the whole story.
Now, why won't Giuliani answer a simple question? Why won't he address what they're asking, which is: "Why did he say on television shortly after 9/11 that he knew beforehand that the towers were about to come down?"
It's pretty simple. And he and his minions can't touch the question... Why? If it's so ridiculous, why doesn't he just explain himself?
===
his blonde friend is the same guy that harassed Rockerfeller and said, right on infowars.com that he was "forced to leave" when in fact, he was just asked gently to stopped being a flippant dick. he says himself he's from wearechange.org, which is slappered all over infowars.com. so much for not related, you lying fuckhead. and no, infowars is not a reliable news source...at all. throughtout all articles, opinions can be read every two parapraphs. it's just like fox news, except you agree with it.
since when is anyone obliged to explain himself? he was getting ignored and could've stopped there but he kept asking louder and louder. he wasn't taken away right away. he was getting more and more annoying until the guy said to the police: "get him out of here [...] done being polite with this guy"
nothing to panick about here. STFU!
Submitted by FilthyAssistant (user info) at 2007-06-07 17:07:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Spam (user info) at 2007-06-07 05:00:18 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
He wasn't asking a question, he was throwing around wild accusations thinky veiled as a question. I imagine he was thrown out because of his aggressive and arguementative manner.
===
Aggressive and argumentative manner? I've seen worse on Prime Minister's Question Time. I expect the yanks to react negatively to anything other than the standard softball question that counts for an interview over here, but you're from the land of Jeremy Paxman.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:55:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2007-06-07 15:20:37 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by no1hasdis (user info) at 2007-06-07 11:49:00 PDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:20:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
If the questions are so preposterous (and some of them are) they should be easy to explain with a little time, research and transparency.
Yet some of them never get addressed and fuel this kind of manic idiocy to continue.
ELECTED government officials should be help specifically accountable for satisfying the curiosity of the people who brought them into power.
However trivial. However painful.
---------------------
If they tried to answer every question from every self-deluded wanna-be intellectual trying to prove what a "genius" he is by coming up with some hare-brained conspiracy theory, they would be complete unable to deal with the requirements of governance, and the country would grind to a halt.
------
thats precisely what these people want.
--------------------------
Listen to yourselves...
My god, is this really what we've become? have we become a nation where everyone is guilty until proven innocent? have we come so far along that we've come full circle and now the government can do no wrong and every difficult question is a hindrance to their ability to govern and not part of their responsibility?
What the hell is the MATTER with you fucking people!?!?>!
What is wrong with you so-called Americans?
Haven't you heard of the 4th Amendment? The 5th Amendment? The 1ST Amendment? Have you even heard of such a thing as the Constitution at all? Did you even GO to school, or were you taught all that you know about history from playing Age of Empires?
Jesus..flippin' Christ
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:49:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:19:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Razor (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:07:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
You all know that I usually disagree with ETS, but the truth is after watching that video they had no right whatsoever to arrest that man.
===
we don,t even know if he was arrested. and that blonde bitch at the end is a two-bit wigger who acts like an oppressed revolutionary. you should watch the video where he harasses a geriatric rockerfeller coming out of his house and simply gets gently told to stop by an old man. he spins it as "forced to leave for asking questions"
we don't even see his "arrested" collegue. he also says "they almost arrested me when i told them it was wrong what they were doing", when in reality, any cop will give you shit if you interfer.
we have a douche by the name of jaggi singh who does the same thing here: stir shit, refuse to comply so that you get removed, violently if possible, film, cry for police state and voilà.
------------------------------
See, this kind of rush judgment on Caul's part is just appalling to me. Am I alone in this?
Look, if you guys want or care to have the whole scoop, listen to the Wednesday Alex jones Show, or go to infowars and read the article they posted.
I cannot stress this enough for those of you who will inevitable make the same idiotic judgments about infowars being somehow "illegitimate" as a news source that there were plenty of other witnesses to what happened and at least one of them was on the Alex Jones Show. He was from a local New Hampshire newspaper with absolutely no affiliation with Infowars.com. He corroborated the whole story.
Now, why won't Giuliani answer a simple question? Why won't he address what they're asking, which is: "Why did he say on television shortly after 9/11 that he knew beforehand that the towers were about to come down?"
It's pretty simple. And he and his minions can't touch the question... Why? If it's so ridiculous, why doesn't he just explain himself?
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:42:18 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:47:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:37:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Couple more things...
First, this was supposed to be my post. I didn't realize FA was signed in on this computer, not that that even matters.
Second, this has everything to do with freedom of speech and freedom of press. It was a private event only insofar as a press pass was required to get into the greenroom in which the question was asked. HE had a press pass. And yes, I'm still one of these crazy nuts that expects public officials to be held to account, especially when they're not answering journalist's questions. I'm one of these "crazy people" that don't think they should just get a free pass.
-----------------
So if Ron Paul was giving a press confrence and I got a press pass and then I got in his face and started yelling, "isn't it true you got your theory of dollar hegemony from Henry Liu who has no training in economy," and "I have proof you only started to speak about it after his article came out in the asian times" over and over and refused to let him answer any other questions or move on you would argue that I should be allowed to stay?
-----------------------
If he avoided your question I'd be asking myself "why". And, no, I wouldn't be calling for you to be dragged out, absolutely not! If my candidate couldn't answer a simple question like that he has no business with my support.
You are totally misrepresenting this whole situation, and YES YOU ARE the one making assumptions, because I heard the whole story from the witnesses and participants themselves on Alex Jones' Show Wednesday.
I put this up here to encourage people to ask questions and look into it for themselves without my holding their fucking hands every step of the way, but obviously none of you seem to have the want or capacity to do such a thing. You'd rather sit there and make judgments and assumptions that suit whatever you have predetermined you want to believe.
I'm not saying I mind the -2s, because there is no content here, but for you to sit there and do this shit is just stupid. You people are mad.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:36:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:44:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:27:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
He had a press pass. He had a right to be there just like everyone else. It's wrong to throw him out, nay, arrest him because he simply asked a question a Giuliani spokesman didn't want to answer.
CNN didn't ask him to leave. They were hosting the event. In fact, they told the officers to leave him alone, if you care to hear his side of events. Giuliani's people are the ones that had him removed, NOT the event hosts.
But you go on and assume what you don't know and keep making an ass of yourself with your wild assumptions about what happened.
----------------
He had a right to be there, but not to stay after he was asked to leave. A press pass is not a magical badge that lets you do whatever you want.
----------------------
You don't get it. The people who asked him to leave were the Giuliani spokespeople who didn't want to answer his question in the first place. They nodded to police, who unquestioningly dragged him out!
Explain that one to me.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 16:34:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by HadToBeDone (user info) at 2007-06-07 13:48:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Looks like criminal harassment to me. Once he was told he would not answer the question, following and shouting at someone is...well, harassment.
He was stopped from harassing whoever that was by the police. He no doubt struggled with them, so he was arrested. Most likely for disturbing the peace.
Fact. And correct.
----------------------
I'm sorry but you guys are just grasping now. If you want the whole scoop, listen to the latest Alex Jones Show... He was charged with "criminal trespassing", which requires, by law, a complaintant who represents the property owners asking the perpetrator to leave and they refuse, but he had a press pass, a CNN rep told the police that he was ok to be there, and he wasn't refusing to leave, he wasn't even asked to leave before he was simply arrested.
You want facts...here they are, a reporter engaged in his job - asking REAL questions and not just catering to the establishment - was arrested for asking a question that a Giuliani spokesman didn't like.
It's pretty much that simple. There were other journalists there, one of whom was interviewed on the Alex Jones Wednesday Show, unaffiliated with the group that was harassed by police who corroborated this.
You people act as if you've never been unduly harassed by police in your life... Do you just not know that shit like this happens? Or are we just living in a different country, here? I can tell you similar things have happened to me, which is why I have almost zero respect for cops now. That's why I try to learn my fucking rights, because without doing it, you can't defend yourself when they try to arrest you or harass you for no reason.
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2007-06-07 15:20:37 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by no1hasdis (user info) at 2007-06-07 11:49:00 PDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:20:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
If the questions are so preposterous (and some of them are) they should be easy to explain with a little time, research and transparency.
Yet some of them never get addressed and fuel this kind of manic idiocy to continue.
ELECTED government officials should be help specifically accountable for satisfying the curiosity of the people who brought them into power.
However trivial. However painful.
---------------------
If they tried to answer every question from every self-deluded wanna-be intellectual trying to prove what a "genius" he is by coming up with some hare-brained conspiracy theory, they would be complete unable to deal with the requirements of governance, and the country would grind to a halt.
------
thats precisely what these people want.
Submitted by no1hasdis (user info) at 2007-06-07 15:09:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:54:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
i'm amazed some people still need to be explained the obvious at the adult age
-----------------------
I suspect Rob & Brad's stunted reasoning ability and lack of cognitive development past the level of a child is directly co-related to their mothers breat-feeding them well into their teen years.
I may not have proof of this, but it's as likely as a government cover-up in blowing up the towers, so I'm just going to take that and run with it.
It must be the TRUTH. If you deny it you are a SHEEP!
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:54:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by no1hasdis (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:49:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
If they tried to answer every question from every self-deluded wanna-be intellectual trying to prove what a "genius" he is by coming up with some hare-brained conspiracy theory, they would be complete unable to deal with the requirements of governance, and the country would grind to a halt.
===
i'm amazed some people still need to be explained the obvious at the adult age
Submitted by no1hasdis (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:53:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07
I STILL WANT SOME ANSWERS ABOUT THIS!!
WHY IS THE GOVERNMENT COVEIRNG IT UP?!?!?
Submitted by no1hasdis (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:49:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:20:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
If the questions are so preposterous (and some of them are) they should be easy to explain with a little time, research and transparency.
Yet some of them never get addressed and fuel this kind of manic idiocy to continue.
ELECTED government officials should be help specifically accountable for satisfying the curiosity of the people who brought them into power.
However trivial. However painful.
---------------------
If they tried to answer every question from every self-deluded wanna-be intellectual trying to prove what a "genius" he is by coming up with some hare-brained conspiracy theory, they would be complete unable to deal with the requirements of governance, and the country would grind to a halt.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:47:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:20:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
If the questions are so preposterous (and some of them are) they should be easy to explain with a little time, research and transparency.
Yet some of them never get addressed and fuel this kind of manic idiocy to continue.
ELECTED government officials should be help specifically accountable for satisfying the curiosity of the people who brought them into power.
However trivial. However painful.
-------------------------------
Shut up when the grown-ups are talking.
First off the guy in that video wasn't an elected official you ignorant cunt.
Secondly there was no reason to answer the question because it was completely loaded and to even acknowledge it is giving too much attention to the retard that asked it.
Third, if it was some Fred Phelps lunatic asking him, "why are you causing God to kill soilders by allowing fags in America" you wouldn't be saying a question is too trivial. if there weren't questions that were too trivial govt officials would spend 24/7 responding to idiots like yourself.
So take you ignorant claims, your short sighted poorly thought out standards on answering all questions and stick them up your ass
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-06-07 14:20:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
If the questions are so preposterous (and some of them are) they should be easy to explain with a little time, research and transparency.
Yet some of them never get addressed and fuel this kind of manic idiocy to continue.
ELECTED government officials should be help specifically accountable for satisfying the curiosity of the people who brought them into power.
However trivial. However painful.
Submitted by HadToBeDone (user info) at 2007-06-07 13:48:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Looks like criminal harassment to me. Once he was told he would not answer the question, following and shouting at someone is...well, harassment.
He was stopped from harassing whoever that was by the police. He no doubt struggled with them, so he was arrested. Most likely for disturbing the peace.
Fact. And correct.
Submitted by DCWoody (user info) at 2007-06-07 12:00:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Twat being a twat on private property.....refuses to leave when asked......gets thrown out by police......what's your problem with this?
Submitted by TheUniter (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:52:40 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Foolproof (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:39:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
The NWO?!? The ILLUMINATI?!?
Are you trying to say that after thousands of years, they finally got their shit together and are starting the "enslavement" thing?
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:39:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY! MARTYR MACFLY!
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:37:51 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:32:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:19:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
we have a douche by the name of jaggi singh who does the same thing here: stir shit, refuse to comply so that you get removed, violently if possible, film, cry for police state and voilà.
--------
no idea why they are even using cops, they should have private security
===
because the NWO people don't want to be surroudned with intimidating security agents. they have to look accesssible before their final strike that will enslave the Earth.
THE TRUTH IS IN UR FACE!
DO YOU WANT TO SEE IT?
Submitted by Foolproof (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:34:30 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR! MARTYR!
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:32:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:19:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
we have a douche by the name of jaggi singh who does the same thing here: stir shit, refuse to comply so that you get removed, violently if possible, film, cry for police state and voilà.
--------
no idea why they are even using cops, they should have private security
Submitted by Foolproof (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:31:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No, but I can say "MARTYR".
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:30:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
wigger hero: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHNeFU6MnGU
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:19:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Razor (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:07:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
You all know that I usually disagree with ETS, but the truth is after watching that video they had no right whatsoever to arrest that man.
===
we don,t even know if he was arrested. and that blonde bitch at the end is a two-bit wigger who acts like an oppressed revolutionary. you should watch the video where he harasses a geriatric rockerfeller coming out of his house and simply gets gently told to stop by an old man. he spins it as "forced to leave for asking questions"
we don't even see his "arrested" collegue. he also says "they almost arrested me when i told them it was wrong what they were doing", when in reality, any cop will give you shit if you interfer.
we have a douche by the name of jaggi singh who does the same thing here: stir shit, refuse to comply so that you get removed, violently if possible, film, cry for police state and voilà.
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:16:40 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
look at those fags with their handicams and backpacks, the guy asks for their documentation and the fag offers his shitty loose change video as evidence, priceless
lock all these fags up in an institution, they've all suffering from paranoid delusions
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:16:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Everyone involved in this video can eat a tremendous dick.
Submitted by Adamdidit2u (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:16:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
"What more can I say?"
Oh, i don't know. Fuck the Police.
Yea, that about sums it up.
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:09:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:59:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I am "calling your ass out" ETS.
http://www.ubersite.com/m/108989#2436354
Would you think it was ok for someone with a press pass to go to a Ron Paul press confrence and get in his face and started yelling, "isn't it true you got your theory of dollar hegemony from Henry Liu who has no training in economy," and "I have proof you only started to speak about it after his article came out in the asian times" over and over and refused to let him answer any other questions or move on you would argue that person should be allowed to stay?
===
ETS would probably sink a hunting knife in that person's abdomen.
Submitted by Razor (user info) at 2007-06-07 10:07:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
You all know that I usually disagree with ETS, but the truth is after watching that video they had no right whatsoever to arrest that man.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:59:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I am "calling your ass out" ETS.
http://www.ubersite.com/m/108989#2436354
Would you think it was ok for someone with a press pass to go to a Ron Paul press confrence and get in his face and started yelling, "isn't it true you got your theory of dollar hegemony from Henry Liu who has no training in economy," and "I have proof you only started to speak about it after his article came out in the asian times" over and over and refused to let him answer any other questions or move on you would argue that person should be allowed to stay?
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:57:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
what everybody said
you do know that there are professional shit stirrers, right? people who film themselves getting arrested for no reason, or so they tell you.
some of these people taunt and resist the law enforcement who are then forced to physically removed them. even more effect when they are arrest brutally so that the crowd around gets pissed and riots. here's a good example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g7zlJx9u2E
the US isn't the only place where fucking around in public and annoying officers will get you into trouble. had he done this in france, he would've been flashballed in the face by a CRS or in Canada, he would've been pwn3d by the politician himself: http://www.freddie.ca/images/chretien-strangle.jpeg LOL, JEAN CHRETIEN! "FOR ME PEPPER, I PUT IT ON MY PLATE"
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:50:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:37:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Second, this has everything to do with freedom of speech and freedom of press. It was a private event only insofar as a press pass was required to get into the greenroom in which the question was asked. HE had a press pass. And yes, I'm still one of these crazy nuts that expects public officials to be held to account, especially when they're not answering journalist's questions. I'm one of these "crazy people" that don't think they should just get a free pass.
-------------------------
So if you have a prss pass you should allowed to shout whatever you want at a press confrence, get in anyones face, and not allow then to answer anyone else's questions.
That is how you interpret freedom of press?
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:47:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:37:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Couple more things...
First, this was supposed to be my post. I didn't realize FA was signed in on this computer, not that that even matters.
Second, this has everything to do with freedom of speech and freedom of press. It was a private event only insofar as a press pass was required to get into the greenroom in which the question was asked. HE had a press pass. And yes, I'm still one of these crazy nuts that expects public officials to be held to account, especially when they're not answering journalist's questions. I'm one of these "crazy people" that don't think they should just get a free pass.
-----------------
So if Ron Paul was giving a press confrence and I got a press pass and then I got in his face and started yelling, "isn't it true you got your theory of dollar hegemony from Henry Liu who has no training in economy," and "I have proof you only started to speak about it after his article came out in the asian times" over and over and refused to let him answer any other questions or move on you would argue that I should be allowed to stay?
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:44:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:27:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
He had a press pass. He had a right to be there just like everyone else. It's wrong to throw him out, nay, arrest him because he simply asked a question a Giuliani spokesman didn't want to answer.
CNN didn't ask him to leave. They were hosting the event. In fact, they told the officers to leave him alone, if you care to hear his side of events. Giuliani's people are the ones that had him removed, NOT the event hosts.
But you go on and assume what you don't know and keep making an ass of yourself with your wild assumptions about what happened.
----------------
He had a right to be there, but not to stay after he was asked to leave. A press pass is not a magical badge that lets you do whatever you want.
To be honest I don't know if it was Guilani's camp or CNN that was hosting it, but who from CNN said to leave him alone? Where is CNN making a public statement that they didn't want him arrested, or that they wanted him to be left there?
In the video the police are already behind the guy because he is causing a disturbance. Where do you see anyone from guilani's camp saying to arrest him?
I don't think I am the one making assumptions here. And opnce again he was not arrested for asking a question or they would have thrown the cuffs on him there. He was arrested because he didn't leave when asked.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:37:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Freedom of speech and freedom of the press has nothing to do with this. neither of those grants you the right to go to a private event and make yourself the center of attention and refuse to leave. What do you think would ever get answered at a press confrence if it was filled with nuts like this asking questions about "chemtrails" and other alex jones fantasies?
---------------
Couple more things...
First, this was supposed to be my post. I didn't realize FA was signed in on this computer, not that that even matters.
Second, this has everything to do with freedom of speech and freedom of press. It was a private event only insofar as a press pass was required to get into the greenroom in which the question was asked. HE had a press pass. And yes, I'm still one of these crazy nuts that expects public officials to be held to account, especially when they're not answering journalist's questions. I'm one of these "crazy people" that don't think they should just get a free pass.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:27:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 07:20:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
That you are a moron who doesn't understand the situation.
That wasn't a public news confrence you needed permission to be there, it was a private event. Once he was asked to leave and didn't he was breaking the law. That was what he was arrested for.
---------------
He had a press pass. He had a right to be there just like everyone else. It's wrong to throw him out, nay, arrest him because he simply asked a question a Giuliani spokesman didn't want to answer.
CNN didn't ask him to leave. They were hosting the event. In fact, they told the officers to leave him alone, if you care to hear his side of events. Giuliani's people are the ones that had him removed, NOT the event hosts.
But you go on and assume what you don't know and keep making an ass of yourself with your wild assumptions about what happened.
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2007-06-07 09:26:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 07:20:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
That you are a moron who doesn't understand the situation.
That wasn't a public news confrence you needed permission to be there, it was a private event. Once he was asked to leave and didn't he was breaking the law. That was what he was arrested for.
The only reason this is a big deal to you is because you drank the kool-aid with ETS and now believe that these alex jones disciples are ambassadors of the truth.
If this had been some Fred Phelps follower asking, sorry shouting, loaded questions about gays in the USA causing soilders deaths, and refusing to move on you would be laughing about him getting tossed out.
Most people with common sense or an ounce of education in science or engineering put both these groups in the same camp (alex jones truthers and fred phelps preachers).
But regardless of the fact that a camera and a blog doesn't make a journalist, regardless of the opinion the psudeo-journalist was making it was still a private event and once he asked his question and the guy made it clear he didn't want to talk to him he had no right to continue disrupting the event.
It is complete BS that you try and spin this like he was arrested for asking a question. You make it out like he saw someone walking down the street in a public place asked them a question and then had the cuffs thrown on him. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press has nothing to do with this. neither of those grants you the right to go to a private event and make yourself the center of attention and refuse to leave. What do you think would ever get answered at a press confrence if it was filled with nuts like this asking questions about "chemtrails" and other alex jones fantasies?
____
I wish I had some eggs and raw bacon cause that burn was HOT!!!
Submitted by Flapjacksupreme (user info) at 2007-06-07 08:46:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Wah eeh eaaaah.
Submitted by HurtByTheSun (user info) at 2007-06-07 07:42:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
Um. I didn't hear the question.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2007-06-07 07:20:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
That you are a moron who doesn't understand the situation.
That wasn't a public news confrence you needed permission to be there, it was a private event. Once he was asked to leave and didn't he was breaking the law. That was what he was arrested for.
The only reason this is a big deal to you is because you drank the kool-aid with ETS and now believe that these alex jones disciples are ambassadors of the truth.
If this had been some Fred Phelps follower asking, sorry shouting, loaded questions about gays in the USA causing soilders deaths, and refusing to move on you would be laughing about him getting tossed out.
Most people with common sense or an ounce of education in science or engineering put both these groups in the same camp (alex jones truthers and fred phelps preachers).
But regardless of the fact that a camera and a blog doesn't make a journalist, regardless of the opinion the psudeo-journalist was making it was still a private event and once he asked his question and the guy made it clear he didn't want to talk to him he had no right to continue disrupting the event.
It is complete BS that you try and spin this like he was arrested for asking a question. You make it out like he saw someone walking down the street in a public place asked them a question and then had the cuffs thrown on him. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press has nothing to do with this. neither of those grants you the right to go to a private event and make yourself the center of attention and refuse to leave. What do you think would ever get answered at a press confrence if it was filled with nuts like this asking questions about "chemtrails" and other alex jones fantasies?
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2007-06-07 05:31:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Actually there's a lot you can say about this kind of thing because it raises a lot of questions. It's not black and white.
Submitted by Progr3ss (user info) at 2007-06-07 05:07:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
It's a fixer-upper. What's the problem? We get a bunch of priests in
here ...
-- Homer Simpson
Treehouse of Horror
Submitted by Spam (user info) at 2007-06-07 05:00:18 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
He wasn't asking a question, he was throwing around wild accusations thinky veiled as a question. I imagine he was thrown out because of his aggressive and arguementative manner.
Either way, I don't really give a shit - I was once thrown out of our local Arndale Centre for leaning against a wall waiting for somebody but you don't see me crying about it on YouTube.
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2007-06-07 04:33:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
"What more can I say?"
Oh, i don't know. Content?
Submitted by Beano312003 (user info) at 2007-06-07 04:01:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-06-07 03:58:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
something that constitutes a post maybe?
heh like I can talk.
Submitted by a_little_more_time (user info) at 2007-06-07 03:55:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
WOWZ A YOOTOOBE VIDEO
Saw it hours ago. +1 because a young guy pissed off an old guy.